A holding BV can look calm on paper while the cash story quietly drifts.
On a Monday morning, a founder opens the balance sheet and sees one familiar line: receivable from shareholder. A private bill passed through the current account. Interest was booked. Nothing felt dramatic. That is exactly why this line deserves attention. In a small BV, the same person can be director, shareholder, and debtor. The ledger still has to keep those roles apart.
When a loan is still a loan
Article 4.12 of Wet IB 2001 covers dividends and similar profit distributions in box 2. Article 4.13 adds a separate rule for excessive borrowing from the own BV. Dutch tax law treats those routes differently, and business files need to do the same. A shareholder can still owe a real civil-law debt while the tax file starts to move in another direction.
The economic route comes first
For 2023, the excessive-borrowing threshold stood at €700,000. From 2024 onward, it is €500,000. In 2026, box 2 is taxed at 24.5 percent up to €68,843 and 31 percent above that. That means a tax charge can arise even when no cash dividend lands in the private bank account.
A current-account balance can be useful for small, short movements. Belastingdienst treats rekening-courant as a place for amounts that are settled quickly. The practical line sits at €17,500. If the balance never exceeds that amount during the year, no interest is calculated. Once it passes €17,500, interest is calculated over the whole balance.
Two routes, one balance sheet
A BV loan to its shareholder must look businesslike. Belastingdienst points to a written agreement, repayment terms, security, businesslike interest, and treatment that matches what an unrelated lender would accept. If the shareholder misses the agreed terms and the file keeps drifting, Belastingdienst may treat the loan as income for the shareholder.
Legal form is not the whole story
That is where many small-company files weaken. A private bill is paid from the BV. A transfer fills a household gap. The repayment is supposed to come after a sale or bonus. Months pass. The ledger still says loan, but the company no longer behaves like a creditor.
Own-home borrowing adds another layer. A BV can lend for the purchase, renovation, or maintenance of an own home. Qualifying interest then belongs in box 1, and the debt does not go into box 3. For the excessive-borrowing test, qualifying own-home debts are excluded. Since 31 December 2022, the BV must also have a mortgage right for such debts, unless the debt already existed on that date.
What a real creditor would do
The Hoge Raad has framed the issue in creditor terms, including ECLI:NL:HR:2015:645 and ECLI:NL:HR:2023:26. The question is plain enough: what would a real third-party creditor have done? A bank would follow dates, interest, security, and recovery. A BV should leave the same trail when the debtor is its own DGA.
That matters because a loan can change character before the file admits it. After lending, the BV may give up creditor rights because of the shareholder relationship. The amount then leaves the BV's assets definitively. Belastingdienst also says conduct or omissions can create that effect, even when the formal claim still sits in the ledger.
Follow one revenue stream
For the founder, this is not a theory exercise. It decides whether the receivable still counts as a company asset, or whether it has become a disguised distribution. It also decides how the balance sheet reads in bank talks, succession planning, and any later dispute over value.
The small-company file that holds up
A strong file does not need drama. It needs order. Put the loan agreement, current-account ledger, interest entries, repayments, security, and tax returns next to each other. The company should be able to explain why the money left, when it comes back, and what happens after a missed date.
That discipline protects both sides. The shareholder avoids a surprise box 2 bill on money already spent. The BV avoids a balance sheet that looks stronger than the claim really is. In a small company, that false strength can confuse lenders, buyers, and family members who rely on the numbers.
The practical answer is simple. Keep short current-account movements short. Keep structural private financing in a proper loan file. Track the €500,000 threshold with care. And if the money is for an own home, classify it as such and keep the mortgage position clean. The tax law does not ask for friendliness. It asks for a company that behaves like a company.
Sources
- Geen winstuitdeling zonder prijsgeven vordering bv – Taxence
- Wettenbank (Wet inkomstenbelasting 2001, art. 4.12) – Definition of regular AB income
- Wettenbank (Wet excessief lenen bij eigen vennootschap) + Wettenbank (Wet IB 2001 art. 4.13 references) – Excessive borrowing fiction in.
- Belastingdienst – Current AB tariff levels (impact on cash planning)
- Belastingdienst (fisin portal: Aanmerkelijk belang) – Excessive borrowing thresholds and operation
- Wettenbank (Staatssecretaris van Financiën) – Belastingdienst policy: Verzamelbesluit aanmerkelijk belang 2025
- Belastingdienst Kennisgroepen – Belastingdienst knowledge position on pricegiving after lending
- Belastingdienst Kennisgroepen – Belastingdienst knowledge on excessive-loan edge cases
Referenced in the article
Column | Compliance
When the Cloud Supplier Holds the Door, Records Need an Exit
A Dutch ACM signal on Azure and AWS turns cloud choice into a question of proof.
Column | Ledger & Tax
An EU Court Signal Leaves Dutch Property Share Deals With a Cash Question
The safer reading is to price current Dutch transfer tax before the final ruling arrives.
The Polder is written for readers who need the Dutch business environment translated into practical meaning. Corrections, source policy and editorial accountability are part of the publication record.
